“It’s not until all your other rights are gone that you will understand why the Second Amendment was placed so high on the Bill of Rights.” - Unknown
The fight over the Second Amendment has never been more fierce. The left has championed gun control laws for some years now, with varying degrees of success, but only now have we seen a groundswell to repeal the Second Amendment fully. A significant number of progressives still won’t come out and say it, but if you watch their online accounts as I do, you will see a large number that will finally admit that repeal is the goal. Or at the very least, they want to dismantle it enough that for all intents and purposes, it is gutted. In the wake of Parkland, the left embraced the shooting survivors with massive funding, platforming, and activism. More than all that though, they have taken a new approach: Blaming the NRA directly and essentially calling the politicians that take money from them, murderers. They paint the NRA as this nebulous force that buys votes and lobbies for the gun industry to make larger profits and cackling diabolically as lives are destroyed. They’ve even created NoRA, an opposing organization that has the backing of numerous celebrities and virtually every left-wing group to harass and oppose politicians that side with the Second Amendment and the NRA.
Here’s what they fail to understand: the NRA has power and influence for one reason:
Because we want them to have that power.
A month ago, I signed up for the NRA for the first time. Why? Because I wanted the NRA to have even more influence. The real power of the NRA lies in its members. The NRA reported 5 million members in 2013, and I’d wager that number is much larger today. After David Hogg and other left-wing activists called for boycotts, myself and tens of thousands more signed up for the very first time. In their lobbying and legislative efforts, they have our backing. Let me make a few things really clear:
1. I want them to finance pro-2A politicians.
2. I want them to have tremendous influence over lawmakers.
3. I want them to finance TV shows like NRA TV.
4. I want them to lobby for pro-2A legislation.
5. I want them to sponsor education and gun knowledge.
They do all of these things and more because we want them to help hold the line at all costs on the Second Amendment. The Bill of Rights is a list of rights not given to us by the government, but fundamental rights we ALREADY HAVE, that are protected. The left seems to believe that these rights are optional, that the government granted them, and can likewise take them away. They do an admirable job trying to hide it and try to piecemeal the dismantling through small pieces of legislation, which they hope over time will effectively make 2A irrelevant. This is why we need the NRA to oppose all of these measures, because every single issue is a slippery slope with the left, as they have proven over and over again. One thing that must be made clear once and for all:
The First and Second Amendments are not up for negotiation.
The NRA holds this frame incredibly well, because that’s what we want them to do, no matter what. The NRA can fight the massive legislative battles that we can’t because we empowered them to do so. The line “money in politics” gets thrown around a lot, but that money comes from us. Sure, the NRA tosses a couple of million into a race once in awhile, but they can do that because WE funded that donation. Then, on top of that, the NRA members themselves donate to those approved candidates as well. The reason we do all of this is that we understand the historical importance of 2A, and a lot of us are old enough to remember a time in America when mass shootings were virtually non-existent. If you check out my links at the bottom and learn some history, you will understand that there was a time when we had lots of guns and didn’t have these shootings to any large degree.
Understand this: the NRA-ILA, the legislative affairs arm of the NRA didn’t even exist until 1975, over 100 years later after the founding of the NRA. Why is that significant? Because there was a time in this country when the Second Amendment wasn’t even questioned. As with virtually all negative cultural issues, there are two Americas: Pre and Post 1968. Guns in America are not going to change, because we won’t allow it, and they aren’t the root cause of our problems. The problem lies with the culture we’ve allowed to breed. Remove every gun, and we still have epidemic levels of suicide, drug use, and poor education. As I wrote about in the Great Cultural Depression, our problems extend well beyond guns and touches virtually every person in the country in some fashion.
I hear the left constantly ask, “What do you need an assault rifle for??” My answer is simple:
Because I can, and frankly, I don’t need another reason.
For further information on understanding the fight we are in over the Second Amendment, check out the following resources:
Why culture, not guns, are to blame for mass shootings: Link
How to defend the Second Amendment: Link
How the Left creates mass shooters: Link
Why the Second Amendment is non-negotiable: Link
Are video games to blame for mass shootings? Link
If you enjoyed this article on Americana Prime, please follow me on social media:
Subscribe to my YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeVPGyFM27xjnbFnC0q7\_UQ?
Watch me on Periscope as well!
Over the course of the last few months, in the wake of the Texas church shooting, I’ve been laying out an overview of how our culture has deteriorated, creating the conditions necessary to breed mass shooters, drug abuse, and suicides. In my article The Great Cultural Depression, I laid out the case, and in How the Left Breeds Mass Shooters and How Our Culture is Destroying the Nuclear Family videos, I took it a few steps further. Over the past week or two after the Parkland shooting, I’ve seen the President more than once lay some of the blame on violent video games. In the wake of the Columbine school shooting in 1999, we saw a tremendous amount of culpability placed on games such as Doom and Wolfenstein for their violence. As we have done after every mass shooting event, we have attempted to lay the blame on a single thing, whether it be guns, games, drugs, or heavy metal music.
The central question is: Are violent video games to blame?
The answer is no, not entirely.
They are certainly part of the problem. Let me preface all of this with a little bit of history on myself and my credibility regarding games. I have played video games my entire life, beginning with Zork back in the 80’s up until the modern games such as Grand Theft Auto 5. For those unaware, Zork is a text-based adventure, which means I have been playing video games since before they even had graphics. I have been involved in gaming at every stage of evolution since the beginning and continuing to the most modern of games. I have played every violent murder fest that’s ever existed from Doom to Soldier of Fortune, to Call of Duty, to Grand Theft Auto 5. I’ve played puzzle games, role-playing games, fighting, action adventure, survival and sports games by the hundreds. In other words, I will match anyone on the planet in credibility on this topic.
I remember the aftermath of Columbine. Everyone was stunned and searching for answers, and a lot of the blame centered on games, specifically Doom. Released in 1993, Doom, along with its precursor Wolfenstein 3D, was the central target of the anti-game crowd. At the time, I was 22 years old and had been playing Doom and many games like it for years. I honestly laughed when I first started hearing the argument that Doom was somehow responsible for events like these. As violent as Doom was, most of the violence centered around attacking demons from hell, and frankly the graphics just weren’t good enough to be a hyper-realistic depiction of murder and gore. I didn’t believe for a second that Doom and it’s brethren had any responsibility for the carnage we saw at Columbine. I was also young and didn’t have the overarching perspective of culture and knowledge I have now, but I still don’t lay much blame at the feet of games from back then.
Fast forwarding to 2001, the game changed. Grand Theft Auto 3 released. In my mind, this is the starting point for real questions regarding violence in games. GTA 3 was the first time I can remember where you had complete freedom. If you wanted to go on an hour-long murder fest blowing away cops and civilians with rocket launchers, you could. Want to take a high-end sports car and mow down old ladies on the sidewalk? Go for it. The degree of freedom was astonishing, and for the first time, the graphics were starting to be good enough to be realistic portrayals of violence. The next major controversy erupted around Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. There is a sequence in this game where you are embedded as a covert agent with a group of terrorists, and you mow down dozens of innocents with a machine gun in an airport. By now, graphics had become hyper-realistic, a near analog to real life. Now, games are incredibly lifelike, and the violence levels are staggering. More than violence though, another modern twist came about: hypersexuality and degeneracy. The recent Grand Theft Auto 5 has you chasing a girl around filming a sex tape, described and shown in lurid detail. Now, not only do we have hyper-realistic violence, but we also have language and sexuality that rivals the worst of most movies, and you are in complete control of it.
One thing that is clear regarding these games: The experts can’t even decide if they are harmful. I’ve read numerous studies, and for every one that says they stoke aggression and reduce empathy, you can find another that claims they don’t. You can see brain scans, psychiatric evaluations, and expert analysis, and yet come to no concrete conclusion. In this article, there are 18 arguments and studies for both Pro and Con on the question “Do video games contribute to youth violence?” No one, not even the experts, can prove definitively that Columbine or Sandy Hook came about as a result of video games. However, it doesn’t take a psychological expert to understand that the things we do the most shape our thought processes. I don’t think it’s all that controversial to suggest that playing an incredibly realistic game for 10 hours a day is going to have at least some degree of cognitive effect, especially on the young. Let me stress another point regarding games like this that is critical: I was 16 when Doom came out, 24 when GTA 3 came out, and 39 when GTA 5 came out. This means I was playing these games at a moderately high maturity level. For me, these games evolved as I aged. As I got older, the maturity of these games ramped up commensurate with my age. I was able to process the concepts and actions on the screen and not be affected by it. Now, I see young kids playing games like these, and I wonder how a little kid can process things that we see in these modern games. I used to work in a major retailer that carried video games, and I would see parents buying these games for young children. Children at young ages are essentially vessels that you pour your beliefs and ideas and influences into. They become what they are taught, which is why you see incredibly vicious children in developing nations wielding AK47s. I don’t believe we fully know the impact on a ten-year-old’s brain of hardcore realistic violence and sex as we see in our media so often these days.
After reading all that, you might surmise that I’m blaming modern games for a lot of our cultural ills. No, not entirely. We have to go deeper than that, down to the root. People want an obvious explanation to a complex problem, even when there isn’t one. I believe the root lies in desensitizing of children, of which there are many contributors. Imagine being a child today, and having access to the entirety of the internet, hyper-violent movies, games, TV, and music that glorifies murder and sexuality. By the time a child is 16, they have been bombarded with these things relentlessly for years on end. Our 16-year-olds are more desensitized than I was at 24. Then on top of all of this, after we desensitize them to virtually everything, we over medicate them with psychotropic drugs, and tell them nothing is their fault, they are just broken. We remove religious identity and values, and don’t teach them national pride and responsibility.
After all of this, we then wonder why they end up committing suicide or killing people.
Games are not the problem, but they are part of it. Our overall culture has become poisonous at an extremely high level, and young kids are not equipped to handle it. So how do we fix this? Since this article is about games, I’ll discuss that point. I cannot believe I’m saying this, but I think we need harsh penalties for parents that allow children access to these games. Much in the same way we tell parents you can’t give your child a beer, or suffer the consequences. The games have rating systems, but we need much harsher penalties for parents that allow a 10-year-old to play Grand Theft Auto 5. I am almost never for government regulation and involvement, but this is a unique case and must be looked at on its own merits. The point is that we have a cultural problem, and it’s going to take a multi-faceted effort to clean it up. One thing is clear: We have to do something. If you think the situation is grave now, I’m here to tell you it is going to get much, much worse. Virtual reality is on the cusp of being not only widely available and cheap but incredibly realistic and immersive.
I love video games, and I want mature titles to play, but we cannot allow children to play a lot of these modern titles. Fortunately, there are plenty of great non-violent titles out there, so there is plenty of choice, but if we don’t take action soon, either at the parental or legislative level, I’m afraid we are in for difficult times ahead.
If you enjoyed this article on Americana Prime, please follow me on social media:
Subscribe to my YouTube Channel: Link
Watch me on Periscope as well!
Steve is the founder and CEO of Americana Prime.